Restraining Orders, Domestic Violence, and GPS

GPS monitoring of repeat sexual offenders: We’re looking at you!

The ravages of domestic abuse never fade. Forty years after my escape from a marriage that nearly took my life, the emotional scars are still visible. Remarried, I’m good at playing the part of confident woman, happy wife and blessed mother. Most of the time, the act doesn’t take much effort. Time has honed my performance skills.

In my recent past, going to the post office or grocery store solo was a major accomplishment. Leaving the house after dark alone – well, that’s a work in progress. Pumping gasoline is still difficult because I feel exposed and vulnerable while waiting for the tank to fill. Seldom do I let the gauge go under the half way mark. “An ounce of prevention,” as Ben Franklin advised us, “is worth a pound of cure.” Far too many abused women have learned the painful fact that a “cure” is rarely possible.

As if my brush with domestic abuse wasn’t bad enough, in 2007 my then 27-year old daughter was kidnapped, beaten and repeatedly raped by a maintenance man who worked in the apartment complex where she lived. He used a master key to gain entrance and tortured her for over three hours. Miraculously, she survived. Her assailant is serving a life sentence for his crime, but, as we all know, in the criminal justice system “life” does not necessarily mean until a convicted felon stops breathing. Needless to say, I am a major proponent of anything that will protect women and children from the very real possibility of pain and/or death that is too often their fate.

Recently, I read with great interest about Global Positioning Satellites (GPS) used for tracking/monitoring violent offenders. According to an article on abuse, twenty-three states are using GPS technology to track assailants. By the latest statistics, the total number of individuals being so monitored is over 5000. That means a lot of women and children are living in fear of their lives on a daily basis.

Among the states that have adopted this technology are Missouri, Wisconsin, California, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Florida. The State of Florida, where my daughter was attacked, requires mandatory lifetime tracking for perpetrators of crimes against children under the age of 11. Wisconsin also mandates lifetime GPS monitoring for repeat child predators.

Based on numerous studies, it has been determined that parolees are less likely to assault another person when they know they are being tracked. Since many experts believe that a predilection toward rape and pedophilia is incurable, lifetime monitoring of repeat offenders should be the norm – not the exception – in all fifty states no matter the age of the victim.

Research showed that not all GPS tracking/monitoring systems are alike. Different systems offer varying levels of protection and, depending on whom you are talking to, different interpretations of tracking/monitoring. Most companies that manufacture these systems advertise that their control centers are staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. Technically, that’s true. There is, however, a caveat not as readily offered.

Tracking merely allows parole/probation officers to see where an offender was when a warning message was sent to their “In box” – not where that offender is at the present moment. An hour or more might pass before that warning is retrieved and, by then, the offender may already have committed another crime. Monitoring is done in “real time,” meaning an offender is never out of sight. “We’re looking at you!”

In reviewing the levels of protection offered by electronic supervision, I learned that all manufacturers of GPS monitoring systems claim to offer full service but many skew the definition of “real time.” Only the immediate transmission of a warning will allow sufficient opportunity to take precautionary measures. Anything less is 59 minutes too late!

If you or a child in your care have been a victim of abuse, contact your local authorities to find out if GPS technology is available in your area. Should the answer be yes, demand to know what kind and be prepared to fight for real time monitoring, if necessary.

If GPS is not being used to track repeat offenders, find an advocacy group to work with toward that end. The life you save could be your own or that of someone you love.

It should be noted that the use of GPS in family court, i.e. divorce/child custody/spousal abuse, is still sporadic. Judges seem to favor restraining orders in cases where the threat of violence is present. If anyone can show me a restraining order printed on paper strong enough to withstand a bullet or fist, please contact me.

Written by 

Donna Carbone


New Domestic Violence Prevention Bills

 

Gov. M. Jodi Rell has signed three bills into law that create broader protections for victims of domestic violence, electronic monitoring of violent offenders and greater awareness of teen dating violence— sweeping reforms the governor said will help prevent abuse and provide support and safety for victims in the “darkest moments.”

“Domestic violence is an issue that touches all walks of life. There is so much pain, so many damaged souls and so much loss. These news laws will strengthen what I believe are already some of the toughest domestic violence laws in the nation,” Rs. Rell said during a recent bill signing ceremony at the Connecticut Coalition on Domestic Violence in East Hartford.

“With these reforms we are providing the support and safety victims need in their darkest moments and harsh penalties for the offenders.,” she said.

The centerpiece of the reforms is House Bill 5497, An Act Concerning the Recommendations of the Speaker of the House of Representatives’ Task Force on Domestic Violence, which addresses numerous programs in criminal justice, social services and education.

The legislation resulted from a bipartisan task force formed by Speaker of the House Christopher Donovan (D-Meriden),

“We’re taking steps to reduce domestic violence, protect families and prosecute violators,” he said. “We need to put a stop to this terrible crime. Today we’re beginning to do just that.”

The law includes the following:

• A pilot program in which the high-risk offenders are electronically monitored and requires the Judicial Branch to apply for federal grants to fund the program;

• Expands information and disclosure requirements for family intervention units, courts and the Department of Children and Families;

• Allows the chief court administrator to establish domestic violence dockets in three geographical areas

• Expands the persistent offender law for crimes involving assault, trespass, threatening, harassment and violation of restraining or protective order.

• Allows courts to consider the convictions for essentially the same crimes in other states.

All provisions take effect Oct. 1, with the exception of the electronic monitoring funding, which is effective upon passage.

Mrs. Rell also signed the following bills:

• House Bill 5246, An Act Concerning the Protection of and Services for Victims of Domestic Violence.

The law makes it easier for tenants who are victims of family violence to terminate their rental agreement without penalty, creates a public service awareness campaign to prevent teen dating violence and mandates the state Department of Social Services to make payments from marriage license surcharges to domestic violence shelters.

The effective date is Oct. 1, except for marriage license surcharge funds and public service campaign, which were effective July 1.

• House Bill 5315, An Act Concerning Education and the Reduction of Domestic Violence.

The law requires school boards to offer training on preventing teen dating violence to employees as part of the health education information they must provide.

It became effective July 1.

The governor said the state has already dedicated more than $2 million in federal stimulus funds over the last year for a variety of domestic violence programs.

Most recently, the state awarded $140,000 in stimulus funds to the Judicial Branch to start a GPS monitoring program for domestic violence offenders in Bridgeport, Danielson and Hartford.

The funds will be used to purchase the monitoring service plus some equipment for a minimum of 21 high risk offenders.

The offenders will be identified by the courts.
Source


Lawsuit accuses GPS firm of aiding domestic abuse

NOTE: The device mentioned in this article was for a vehicle, not a person.
We hope they throw the book at this guy!

By Bruce Vielmetti of the Journal Sentinel

Should a company that provides GPS tracking service be liable for domestic violence inflicted with the help of that technology?

A Milwaukee County lawsuit claims it should.

The use of GPS by offenders to stalk their victims is nothing new, but advocates for victims of domestic violence on the local, state and national level say they have never heard of a victim suing a GPS service.

The lawsuit claims a Missouri company, Foxtrax Vehicle Tracking Inc., aided and abetted “Jack Doe” to commit assault and battery on “Jane Doe” in 2008, including while she was seven months pregnant. The suit does not state so specifically, but implies that Jack Doe installed a tracking device on Jane Doe’s vehicle.

The civil complaint, filed this week in Milwaukee County Circuit Court, names Jack Doe, Foxtrax and “as yet unidentified co-conspirators” as defendants. It says Jane and Jack Doe had a domestic partnership that began in March 2007, and that he was abusive and threatening toward her, “for the sole purpose of restraining the liberty and freedom of movement” of Jane Doe.

The parties’ real names were not used because Jane Doe fears retaliation, according to the suit.

Her attorney, Thomas Napierala of Bayside, said his client’s fear also prevented her from reporting the assaults to police or seeking a restraining order.

Foxtrax officials did not return calls seeking comment Friday.

Carmen Pitre, who heads the Sojourner Family Peace Center in Milwaukee, said that in the context of an abusive relationship, abusers will use anything at their disposal to control their victims.

“New technology has opened the universe wide and given abusers an array of tools,” she said. “It’s hard to protect against all that.”

The lawsuit also claims that Foxtrax at some point was notified of the situation involving Jane Doe, “but refused to discontinue aiding and abetting” Jack Doe, “purely for the sake of profit.”

If that was proven, Pitre said, it would be even more problematic.

Tony Gilbart, of the Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence, said a bill in the state Assembly this year would have made it a crime to track someone by GPS without their consent. There was no companion bill in the Senate, he said.

While Gilbart acknowledges abusers would not likely follow that law and notify their targets, he said such a law would provide another enforcement tool against those who would use GPS to stalk people.

Gilbart also said the Milwaukee County lawsuit should remind anyone who thinks they might be subject of unwanted tracking or stalking to have their vehicle checked for a GPS transponder and to call their cell phone company to see if anyone else has access to their location if their cell phone has GPS.

Cindy Southworth, who founded a project that tracks technology with the National Network to End Domestic Violence, in Washington D.C., also said she had not heard of any lawsuits by domestic violence victims against GPS tracking services for vicarious liability.

“I would honestly love to see some,” she said, “especially against those companies that blatantly advertise spying on your spouse.”

That doesn’t appear to be the situation in the Milwaukee County case. According to its Web site, Foxtrax primarily aims to serve companies with vehicle fleets that wish to increase security, efficiency and accountability. But it does indicate that low-level service can be purchased to track a single vehicle.

Napierala said he believes Jack Doe had no other legitimate reason to buy the service other than to follow Jane Doe.


Mark Fields, former NFL player, arrested outside Goodyear child-care center

by Jackee Coe – Aug. 10, 2010 07:12 PM
The Arizona Republic

Former NFL linebacker Mark Fields was arrested Monday at a Tutor Time in Goodyear on suspicion of beating the mother of his 6-year-old daughter, according to Maricopa County Superior Court documents.

Fields, a Litchfield Park resident, was arrested about 5:15 p.m. at the child-care facility near Dysart and McDowell roads after several witnesses said he beat the woman and put her in a choke hold, records show. 

The woman, Field’s ex-girlfriend, was at the Tutor Time to drop off court-ordered paperwork, but while she was there, Fields confronted her outside the front entrance. As the two began arguing, Fields grabbed the woman by the throat and began to choke her, then threw her to the ground and “threatened to kill her,” records state.

The woman, who lives in California, had blood on her left arm, bruises and visible scratches, according to records. During the fight, their daughter fell over and hurt her arm.

The fight “caused a disruption in the normal business transactions and educational learning at the facility,” court documents said.

Fields was booked into Fourth Avenue Jail on felony counts of aggravated assault and interference with education, and misdemeanor counts of endangerment and disorderly conduct, according to booking documents. He was being held on $10,000 bond.

Booking documents state Fields has a history of domestic violence and that the frequency and intensity of incidents is increasing.

The couple has been embroiled in an ongoing legal dispute over child custody and accusations of domestic violence.

Fields played in the NFL from 1995 to 2004 with the New Orleans Saints, St. Louis Rams and Carolina Panthers.


Counties studying high costs for ‘Amanda’s Law’

July 27–Judge-executives from the Owensboro region said Monday they are unsure how they will comply with “Amanda’s Law,” a new state law that allows courts to put global positioning system devices on people who violate emergency protective orders.
The law, which was passed by the state legislature during the spring session and went into effect July 15, does not include any money to help pay for the GPS devices that will be needed.
“It’s the classic unfunded mandate,” Daviess County Judge-Executive Reid Haire said.

“Amanda’s Law” was passed in memory of Amanda Ross, who was fatally shot Sept. 11, 2009. At the time of the shooting, Ross had an active restraining order against Stephen R. Nunn, a former state legislator who is accused of killing her. He is the son of former Gov. Louie B. Nunn.

The law gives judges the right to force people who violate restraining orders to wear GPS devices so their whereabouts can be monitored at all times.

Haire was not aware that the law is in effect until contacted by the Messenger-Inquirer, but he said county officials will begin looking into the issue.

“I know we did not budget that,” Haire said. “Hopefully in the next few days, we’ll have a plan of action.”

Daviess County Attorney Claud Porter said he has met with law enforcement officials to discuss the law. “The statute says counties are not supposed to pay for it,” Porter said. “The problem is … if (the person ordered to wear a GPS device) is declared indigent, they don’t have to pay for it and the provider has to absorb the cost.”

Porter said that sets up a system where the company eventually chosen by the county to provide the GPS service will have to estimate how many people will not be able to pay for GPS devices — and base its fees on that estimate to make up for those who can’t pay.

“They will not know how many … will be declared indigent. They’ll have to guess a number, so they (can) spread the cost over those who are able to pay,” Porter said.

Counties will have to contract with GPS providers for the service. The law requires a GPS operation that can both monitor the person ordered to wear the device and notify the person who took out the protective order if a violation occurs.

“It’s complicated and somewhat expensive,” Porter said. ” … What we would have to do is (advertise) for a system to be paid for by the persons being monitored, except for those declared indigent,” while including a disclaimer that “the county is not responsible” for picking up the cost of those who cannot pay.

“If I were answering that proposal, I’m not sure I would answer, (or would say), ‘We’ll tell you what it will cost (per person monitored), and we’ll not monitor anyone else’ ” who cannot pay, Porter said.

Hancock County Judge-Executive Jack McCaslin said there have been discussions in the county about the new law. McCaslin said the county has a system for monitoring people sentenced to home incarceration that relies on a land telephone line. That system costs the person being monitored about $2 per day.

“The GPS system they’re talking about using … they run $7 a day,” McCaslin said. “If we have to pay for those, some of those EPOs run for months. That would break the bank.”

McCaslin said using GPS to monitor people who violate protective orders is “a good concept,” but the county will have to pay for indigent people who are ordered to wear the devices.

“Most of them are probably going to be indigent,” McCaslin said.

The county or the commonwealth’s attorney’s office will have to attempt to collect the fees from everyone judged able to pay, McCaslin said.

The number of people who could be ordered to wear the devices will create a financial drain for counties, McCaslin said.

“We’re just a little, old, small county, but our county has a lot of domestic violence,” McCaslin said. “You look at big counties … who knows how much domestic violence they have?

“The bottom line is, who’s going to pay for it? The counties,” McCaslin said.

Ohio County Judge-Executive David Jones said he hasn’t studied the new law closely yet.

“For me, it’s not unusual for legislators to adopt bills and not put in money to take care of it,” Jones said. But Jones said: “Anything we feel like we need to do, we’ll do it.”

Muhlenberg County Judge-Executive Rick Newman could not be reached Monday for comment.

McLean County Judge-Executive Larry Whitaker said putting people who violate protective orders on GPS tracking will likely be less expensive than the alternative — sending them to jail.

“I think there are trade-offs,” Whitaker said. “(The county buys) drug testing kits right now. What that allows us to do is (allow offenders to be) released rather than incarcerated. The cost of providing the tests is cheaper than incarceration fees.

“I think I would take a hard look at, ‘How much is it going to cost us incarcerate them?’ ” Whitaker said.

The person ordered to wear a GPS device “should pay for it,” Whitaker said. But counties could also look at fees to pay for the service, such as fees that were created to pay for the construction of new judicial centers, Whitaker said.

“We can be creative, if the legislature will allow us to do that,” Whitaker said.

James Mayse, 691-7303, jmayse@messenger-inquirer.com
By James Mayse Messenger-Inquirer, Owensboro, Ky.
Publication: Messenger-Inquirer (Owensboro, Kentucky)
Date: Tuesday, July 27 2010


Amanda’s Law GPS not used

Many counties say it’s too expensive

By Jim Hannah
jhannah@nky.com

This article first appeared in The Enquirer on July 25, 2010.

A much-ballyhooed state law designed to protect victims of domestic violence took effect two weeks ago, but a key enforcement component isn’t being used.

A provision to place GPS tracking devices on people who have protective orders filed against them is an unfunded mandate that counties are struggling to find money to operate, say some county officials and their lobbying arm in Frankfort.

To cite money as a reason not to implement the major component of the law is a way for county officials to avoid fulfilling their duty, says Dale Emmons, a spokesman of the family of a woman whose killing inspired what has become known as Amanda’s Law.

It is named for state employee Amanda Ross, who was fatally shot in September outside her Lexington home. Her ex-boyfriend, former state lawmaker Steve Nunn, is charged with murder in her death.

“For someone to use money as an excuse not to use Amanda’s Law is absolutely not being truthful to the people they are talking to,” said Emmons, also a Democratic political consultant who lobbied for the law. “That’s a bogus argument, in my judgment.”

The legislation was introduced by House Speaker Greg Stumbo, D-Prestonsburg, to protect women like Ross, who had a protective order against Nunn.

Other provisions of the law call for judges to have criminal background reports on the person seeking a protective order and the person they want the order against. While the old law required a person to stay 500 feet away from the person being protected, the new law can ban a person from visiting a particular address, such as a workplace, school or family member’s home.

Emmons said ordering someone to wear a GPS tracking device for violating a protective order is cheaper then locking them up in jail.

It costs $4 to $7 per day for someone to wear a GPS tracker, according to testimony presented at hearings on the legislation that created Amanda’s Law. By comparison, it costs taxpayers $31 per day to hold someone at the Kenton County jail.

County politicians who don’t provide tracking devices will be held accountable by voters the next time there is a killing that could have been averted with a tracking device, Emmons said.

Stumbo defended the bill he pushed through this year’s legislative session.

“Amanda’s Law is a tool designed to do two things: Increase the safety of domestic violence victims and save counties money on jail costs,” he said. “By using electronic monitoring devices in such cases, counties will reap great savings.”

He said it wasn’t an unfunded mandate because the legislation was rewritten before it passed to make GPS tracking optional for counties.

One reason counties are not quickly adopting the GPS tracking provision is that the legislation is “vague” on who will pay for it, said Denny Nunnelley, the executive director of Kentucky Association of Counties, a lobbying group based in Frankfort.

Neither Nunnelley nor Kentucky’s Administrative Office of the Courts, which oversees the state’s judicial system, could identify any county that has implemented the GPS monitoring called for in the law.

If it wasn’t going to cost counties any money, Nunnelley said, the state justice cabinet, or corrections department, wouldn’t have objected to legislation that would have put them in charge of administering the program. They did, and the legislation was changed before passage to place the responsibility for the monitoring program on each county.

Had the state been in charge, one GPS provider could have been contracted for the entire state instead of having each of the 120 counties seeking individual contracts.

The executive director of the Bluegrass Domestic Violence Program said there is confusion about the funding for GPS tracking. The program, based in Central Kentucky, operates a women’s crisis hot line and women’s shelters.

“Who can afford it?” Darlene Thomas said. “I think that is still a good question, honestly.

“Who is going to have to pay for this?”

Kenton County Judge-executive Ralph Drees said he had not heard of the funding issue for GPS trackers until contacted by a reporter.

“Anytime the legislature approves something, they need to put the money there, or don’t mess with this stuff,” he said.

Boone County Judge-executive Gary Moore said he was aware of Amanda’s Law – and supports its intent – but that there was no money in the current fiscal year to fund the GPS trackers.

“Like so many things that are happening now, this is an unfunded item from the state government,” he said.

Moore said he plans to meet with family court, district court and circuit court judges and county administrators to get input on possible ways to get the money.

“It is very early in the process,” he said, “and we are still sorting through all the issues.”

Campbell County Administrator Robert Horine said his county is also reviewing its options. “Thus far, we have not yet taken any action in this regard,” he said.

One option allowed under the law is for counties to join forces and operate a regional GPS tracking system, said Linda Bramlage, the sole family court judge for Boone and Gallatin counties.

She said Boone and Gallatin counties were inquiring whether they could “piggyback” on a tracking system already used at the Kenton County jail.

The problem is that system doesn’t meet the new law’s specifications. The law requires that the GPS tracker not only record one’s movements, but also directly alert the person who requested the protective order if the person being monitored gets within 500 feet. “Nobody has any money,” Bramlage said, “but we are going to have to figure out how to do it.”

Stumbo said the legislation was written to allow counties to pass on the costs, in most cases, to the person being monitored. He said county officials who say otherwise are not educated on the law.

Counties could contract with GPS tracking services that would charge the people ordered to wear the devices, according to the law. The price could be adjusted upward to cover the costs of indigent people in the program.

“In all honesty, the person who violates the (protective order) is supposed to pay for it, but the county has to get it started somehow,” Bramlage said. “They have to find some funds for that.”

The British corporation G4S has a contract with the Kentucky Department of Corrections to provide GPS tracking used by parole and probation officers. A company spokeswoman said it already offers GPS tracking for people who have protective orders filed against them in other states. Some of those states also require the users of the devices to pay for the program.

The spokeswoman said the cost to provide the service in Kentucky would depend on the number of people ordered to wear the devices. And that number could be low.

A person would have to violate a protective order before a judge could order them to wear a GPS tracker, and the person who requested the protective order would have to agree to the arrangement under the version of the law that passed the legislature.

Campbell County Family Court Judge Gayle Hoffman said she has had only one person who fit those criteria in the last six months.

“In some respects, this can be a really good law,” she said. “But it isn’t something we see every day.”


GPS Monitoring of Batteres and stalkers squashing the myths


I have been lobbying for legislation that will allow the use of GPS monitoring in domestic violence and stalking cases across the country. Time and time again I am always asked the same question, “Do you think GPS monitoring gives victims a false sense of security?”.

The answer is NO! Here is why.

 

What does give victims a false sense of security is a white piece of paper with black writing on it that says R-E-S-T-R-A-I-N-I-N-G O-R-D-E-R!

Like millions of stalking and domestic violence victims I walked out of the court house as fearful as I was upon entering for the restraining order hearing, and today even with a protective order in effect I have no way to know really if the batterer now a stalker will make good on his threats to kill me, but I refuse to let that get me down but getting to this place was not easy.

I live each day to the fullest, and I am happy to be alive, but I never let my guard down and I will definitely not be an easy target for a stalker or for anyone, and this is not because of any help or support that I have received from any Domestic Violence,Crime Victim Organization, District Attorney, DA Investigator or even from law enforcement.

After being turned away from the local domestic violence center because of my batterers occupation, I knew that I was going to have a very difficult time, but with time I realized I had two choices.

1.) I could complain and gripe from the sidelines

OR

2.) I could fight like hell to change the way crime victims are treated here where I live and beyond to ensure “No Victim is Left Behind”

I chose option number two.

I reported restraining order violations and stalking incidents repeatedly, and I knew from the way I was treated and also from hearing the words come straight from the various deputy sheriff’s, District Attorney and DA Investigator’s mouths that it was up to me and me alone to protect myself, nobody was going to do anything.

I had never taken any self defense classes and gun ownership had not crossed my mind until one was pointed my direction by some thugs sending me a message from my batterer. I learned quickly that I could cry and complain, or I could gather the tools and resources to ensure my safety and teach other victims of crime how to survive as well.

There was no free lunch and no picnic for me, and just like millions of crime victims every year I was left behind; but I got back up stronger, wiser and better than ever before. I am thankful for this opportunity to share my experiences, and to help ensure that “No Victim is Left Behind” as I was.

The problem with restraining orders is that they offer false hope not GPS monitoring.

Protective Orders,Restraining Orders, Orders of Protection, No Contact Orders are all great tools if a victim has the ability to pay for surveillance equipment, a driver and does not have to work or leave the home, but for everyday victims who need to “live” and care for children and can’t afford the expensive surveillance equipment, driver and security full time they are useless without GPS monitoring.

That is why I advocate and lobby for GPS monitoring nationwide, and bare my soul and life experiences pertaining to what I have endured, so that stalking victims like Jeffrey Gross of New York who was shot 6 times at close range by his stalker, and those tragically murdered like Mary Babb of Michigan and Cindy Bischof of Illinois do not get overlooked or swept under the rug.

I am here and I have a chance to help save lives by promoting this legislation so I do because I can.

Today tragically many victims are encouraged to run and hide by law enforcement, advocates and the justice system, however running and hiding is not a solution.

Running and hiding was always an option folks would throw out at me and I would laugh because with the datafurnishing business today anyone can locate anybody with a few clicks of a mouse and a phone call or two. I know this from my work as a high-tech investigator locating people, assets, and doing investigations.

It is a piece of cake to find anyone at anytime these days and it costs very little. Anybody can locate anyone, even the “bad guys” convicted criminals, violent batterers and stalkers have the ability to locate anyone today.

Even Judges, prosecutors, law enforcement, victims and the general public have no place to hide because all of our records are on-line and being provided by companies known as datafurnishers.

If you don’t know what a datafurnisher is or what datafurnishing is visit about.com women’s issues and read the segment regarding datafurnishing.

http://womensissues.about.com/od/violenceagainstwomen/f/datafurnishing.htm

Privacy is still an issue today for everyone including crime victims. I receive hundreds of calls and e-mails each week from victims, witnesses, members of Law enforcement, prosecutors and from members of the public who are concerned about their privacy.

There is no magic wand to go below the radar for anyone. Even those in the witness protection program have been located and the program penetrated.

Today, technology is being used by perpetrators and it is time that technology be available to victims.

With GPS it creates a real solution to prevent violence and it works, however there is a lot of misinformation out there giving victims false hope and the public misinformation regarding the implementation of the GPS monitoring programs after the legislation has been passed.

An important subject not often reported is the truth regarding the GPS monitoring programs implementation. There should be a big disclaimer on every law makers web site and included within the law makers press releases when the bill is introduced, indicating how, where and when the GPS monitoring will be implemented so that victims are not re-victimized or given false hope and to prevent misunderstanding.

Just because the GPS legislation has passed in any particular state, does not mean that GPS monitoring is available.

Not every state that has passed and approved GPS monitoring legislation has it implemented or available to victims in every county of every state -if at all.

In Illinois for example where Cindy’s Law was passed last year, victims contact me confused and heartbroken to learn that the GPS monitoring is not available in the county where they live. Other victims contact me uninformed and not sure how to request that GPS monitoring be implemented in their particular case.

In CA, GPS monitoring legislation was passed but can’t be implemented because of the costs, so this is an issue that must be addressed because victims lives are at stake.

I can’t emphasize this enough, there is a lot of misinformation coming from the press releases from public officials who have introduced the GPS monitoring legislation without providing victims and the public with accurate information regarding the implementation of the GPS monitoring program. This must change.

Tragically, domestic violence makes for good headlines, so passing the law helps many politicians garner press and often on the backs of innocent and vulnerable domestic violence victims.

I am appalled that law makers would not provide accurate information to the press and more importantly to victims, but with organizations like Survivors In Action and by speaking out I hope that this information will make its way to those who need it the most the victims, and help to send a reminder to law makers that it is not “ok” to introduce legislation without ensuring that victims needs are addressed and taken seriously.

GPS monitoring works and has been proven to be 100% effective at preventing homicide in domestic violence cases when implemented, however there is much work still needed to be done to ensure that the GPS monitoring is being implemented so that “No Victim is Left Behind”.

To learn more about GPS monitoring visit Survivors In Action
“No Victim Left Behind”

By:Alexis A. Moore


Promoting Active GPS Technology to Protect Victims of Domestic Violence


Promoting Active GPS Technology to Protect Victims of Domestic Violence

Laws for sex offenders to wear global positioning system (GPS) devices vary by state. Some states, such as Missouri, Florida, Oklahoma, and Ohio, require certain sex offenders to wear GPS bands for life. Currently, it is not mandatory for abusers in domestic violence cases to wear a GPS tracking device; people are speaking up about this issue.

In March, Assemblyman Felix Ortiz spoke out for legislation he calls the Erika Bill, which would require any individual with an order of protection issued due to domestic violence to wear an ankle GPS monitoring device. The bill is named after Erika Delia, who was murdered by an ex-boyfriend while a restraining order was in effect.  Ortiz made the point that “every 15 seconds an instance of domestic violence occurs.”

Active GPS technology is the safest option for all victims of abuse. Passive GPS tracking devices seem insufficient when compared to newly available active GPS devices that alert domestic abuse victims by call or text if an abuser is in close range. 

This May, a sex offender in Northern California, Leonard Scroggins, removed his passive GPS tracking device. Though this technology is used with other crime prevention strategies, Scroggins was still able to make it to San Diego, where he attacked four women within two days. If he were wearing an active GPS that immediately alerted authorities when cut off, time could have been saved and lives protected.

Passive GPS tracking bands require an individual to physically observe a wearer’s activity at intervals while active GPS bands are able to send instant alerts via cell phones if a wearer violates area guidelines. Active GPS technology costs around $10-$15 a day. The small devices combine GPS and cellular technologies and do not require proximity to a separate stationary transmission box as other available monitoring systems do. These new devices may also help domestic violence victims to feel more secure that their abuser will not be able to get close without warning. Though some GPS companies advertise active GPS technology and may provide 24 hour monitoring, not all devices are said to provide cell phone alerts.

Active GPS technology has become available for local authorities to implement in cases. Recently, GPS Monitoring Solutions demonstrated its active GPS product in California for court employees, lawyers and victims of domestic violence. Their technology concentrates on victim notification and provides real-time location tracking with the TrackerPal.

A Texas based company, Satellite Tracking of People LLC, provides a BlueTag Active band that transmits data at least once every ten minutes. Attorney General and Minister of Justice Kim Wilson wore an ankle bracelet for one week to test the device and feels that it could serve as an incentive for rehabilitation for offenders and cut down on prison populations in Bermuda.

As GPS devices continue to improve and individuals help to speak out on behalf of domestic violence, technology can be used as a safer and more reliable option to protect victims of abuse.

Last year, Cherry Simpson wrote for the Survivor’s Blog on how GPS tracking kept her daughter safe in an abusive relationship. Read her story here. This is only one example of how GPS technology has helped in a domestic violence situation, surely there are many more. Victims of domestic violence can seek an order of protection, but a piece of paper is not always enough. Active GPS devices should still be used in combination with other safety measures and victims should remain alert to the reality that the technology is not foolproof.

 Sources:

http://www.review-news.com/main.asp?SectionID=60&SubSectionID=126&ArticleID=6149

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/30/a-broken-system/

http://www.sbsun.com/news/ci_15200626#ixzz0pdIEoCqY

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/30611/

http://www.gpsmonitoring.com/family-courts.html

http://www.royalgazette.com/rg/Article/article.jsp?articleId=7da313b30030000&sectionId=60

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,164288,00.html

http://www.ndvh.org/2009/05/gps-tracking/

Article found at The National Domestic Violence Hotline


HuffPost Innovator Series – GPS Monitoring Solutions: Keeping Victims Safer

HuffPost Innovator Series

If the economic recovery is going to happen any time soon, these are the kind of companies that will be leading the way.

As the economy continues to struggle and the job crisis mounts, HuffPost Business set out to find the companies that are both changing the way we think of business and creating badly needed jobs. In the first edition of our HuffPost Innovator Series, we sifted through more than 200 submissions from HuffPost readers who nominated ground-breaking companies from around the country. Some of the most promising are doing more than just innovating with technology. One company is turning cell phones into a potentially revolutionary tool for the blind; another is re-imagining of the common electrical socket; and two start-ups brought powerful efficiency to the worlds of student lending and volunteering.

To submit an innovative entrepreneur, startup or established company, click “Participate” below and upload a short description and picture of the founder or business leader you’d like to nominate. (Note: Please skip the marketing jargon and keep your descriptions short.) If your story is compelling, a HuffPost staffer will contact you to learn more about your story.

Which company is the most innovative? Check out the HuffPost Innovators Series below:

Victim Notification System

The current system used to track individuals who’ve had restraining orders filed against them is flawed and Petra Fuhriman, owner of GPS Monitoring Solutions, is out to fix it.

Fuhriman’s brainchild is a tamper-proof bracelet with a strap that fits around the ankle of a domestic violence offender complete with mobile devices that enable both victim and offender to monitor each other’s distance.

How is this different than any other GPS monitoring device? “It’s the only device of its kind that has real-time monitoring,” Fuhriman explains.

Current devices merely send an e-mail alert to authorities when offenders violate the court-mandated stay-away distance. As a result, authorities often don’t respond to the e-mail alerts in a timely fashion — “in certain California counties, there are backlogs of up to 31,000 alerts,” says Furhriman.

When offenders violate the stay-away distance, the device sends an instant alert to the victim, the police and GPS’s internal monitoring staff, on call 24/7, who immediately call the police department.

Furhriman founded her firm in January 2009, and her clients include attorneys seeking reduced bail, alternative sentencing or pre-trial release for the offenders they represent.
– Nathaniel Cahners Hindman

Petra Fuhriman:
GPS Monitoring Solutions is driven to protect victims from domestic violence, and we ask for your help in letting the citizens of your state know about our life saving devises. (Our Motto is Safety Fast-Safety Now.) We as a team can make a valuable difference in your communities. Using GPS with Victim Notification in Restraining Orders, the intended victim is alerted in real-time, and ahead of time that the person monitored is getting close to violating the Stay-away distance. The intended victim is also alerted should someone begin tampering the bracelet. Again, in real time. For the first time in their lives potential victims have the ability ahead of time to leave the area and save their own Life. “begin tampering the bracelet. Again, in real time. For the first time in their lives potential victims have the ability ahead of time to leave the area and save their own Life. “


GPS monitoring will add more protection

First published in print: Saturday, June 19, 2010
Recently I saw news coverage of Schenectady County Legislature Chairwoman Susan Savage’s proposal to provide GPS monitoring as an option for judges to order for domestic violence offenders. This is a great idea. 
Orders of protection are merely pieces of paper and cannot prevent a determined offender from again committing a violent act. This proposal will provide additional protection to victims and is an important step to combating reoccurring domestic violence.I am glad to see leaders such as Ms. Savage stepping up and working on this important issue. I hope that my representatives in Albany County will follow her lead.

If it stops one woman from suffering, it is worth it.

Laura Fasani

Altamont
Read more: http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=942833&category=LETTER&BCCode=OPINION&newsdate=6/21/2010#ixzz0sAOOTna3


  •  

    September 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Aug    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930  
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Copyright © 2009 GPS Monitoring Solutions
    iDream theme by Templates Next | Powered by WordPress
    Partly powered by CleverPlugins.com